Is Vaping Health Risky?
The writer examines the possible social and health advantages of adolescent smoking, while also considering potential harm. She refers to e-cigarettes as electric cigarettes but calls them a tobacco product. The authors explore the various options available for teens in light to the fact that smoking has turned into a socially unacceptable behavior. She argues that we should consider the social norms that promote smoking to teens, while also considering the dangers of nicotine addiction. The writer also examines the difference between teenage smoking and adult smoking. After reviewing the literature, I agree with her that e-cigarette vaporizers certainly are a harmless alternative to smoking, if used correctly.
A lot of the data on smoking and its own risks comes from adults, which helps it be hard to assess how the risks are reduced by e-smoking. It’s estimated that approximately fourteen thousand deaths every year are due to smoking. This figure is likely an underestimation, since many deaths may be the result of second hand smoke. In addition, it assumes that people who smoke don’t intend to do so.
The author suggests that we should think about the fact that e-cigarettes mimic the result of tobacco products, while providing a far less harmful experience. The problem with this particular approach is that it treats all smoking as dangerous, though it isn’t. Many people don’t realize how similar the taste of a cigarette to a vaporizer, or how similar the physical act of smoking would be to smoking. Furthermore, it presumes that people who use the cigarettes aren’t taking any real risks. The argument that originates from that is that because e smokers don’t feel any of the physical effects of smoking, they can not be deemed to be causing these deaths, when they are.
However, it’s important to remember that smoking and using vaporizers are both virtually identical behaviors. Why is vaporizing unique is that it allows a smoker to have the same effect as smoking, without the associated risks. Vaporizing offers a highly similar experience as smoking. This means that vapers could be increasing their likelihood of quitting the habit. In addition, it means that they are taking Electric Tobacconist steps in direction of protecting their health while simultaneously increasing the opportunity of enjoying a wholesome lifestyle.
The writer makes some valid points concerning the dangers of smoking. He also makes some valid criticisms of the lack of nicotine, and of the dangers of carbon monoxide smoke. However, his real issue is among regulation. He argues that e-cigarette companies shouldn’t be permitted to advertise their products as safe when all they will have done is increase the quantity of chemicals and additives that are present in traditional cigarettes. The problem with this argument is that we have already seen the negative effects of increased degrees of these chemicals in traditional cigarettes.
We already have countless reports about the negative side effects of nicotine, especially in smokers trying to quit. We already have plenty of stories concerning the rise of cancers and respiratory problems due to long-term nicotine use. It’s true that e-cigs don’t contain any nicotine, but that hasn’t stopped them from being advertised as a cure-all for smoking. E Cigarettes have certainly been a key point in the spike in smoking-related deaths over the past couple of years.
The author does not appear to recognize the irony of arguing against smoking by way of a healthier alternative, but doesn’t seem to think about the potential negative health effects of his product either. He also discounts the idea that smokers who switch to the cigarettes will eventually reverse to cigarette smoking. He seems to think that all we have to do to beat cigarettes would be to reduce the amount of nicotine we take in. The truth is that smokers who try to quit often do so because of other health issues, and aren’t just embracing the cigarettes to get away from their bad habits. There are numerous reasons why people smoke. The author has basically ignored all of them in his arguments against vaping.
While it holds true that the cigarettes do not contain any real tobacco, some of the chemicals found in using tobacco are found in the smokes. The author seems to be of the fact that all we need to do to solve the issue of smoking is to decrease the amount of chemicals we take in through our lungs. The argument he presents is merely not located in sound scientific fact. There is no real proof that reducing the quantity of chemicals we ingest improves anything other than our health and wellness. The author also discounts the idea that the cigarettes are less dangerous than regular cigarettes since they don’t contain the harmful chemicals found in regular cigarettes.